Abstract

This article examines how deficiencies in Georgian culinary terminology hinder sustainable development and market access. Drawing on dictionary surveys, fieldwork and terminological analysis, the author shows that absent or imprecise terms prompt ad hoc borrowings, weaken the national special‑purpose language (SPL) and obstruct training, certification, digital services and international interoperability. Case studies (ekala, khinkali, pomelo, cashew) and an evaluation of major lexica reveal recurring philological and translational challenges, compounded by Georgia’s distinctive script and limited terminological resources. The study emphasises the importance of reintroducing forgotten Georgian terms and argues for a coordinated national response – terminology planning, interoperable datasets, pedagogical dissemination and public–private governance – to protect linguistic identity, reduce digital inequality and strengthen the competitiveness of Georgian producers.