Abstract

This study examines the arguments for and against restoring the monarchy in Georgia; evaluates the case for establishing a parliamentary monarchy in the context of the country’s Orthodox faith, history and contemporary political realities. It distinguishes constitutional and parliamentary monarchy from the absolute monarchy criticised by Thomas Paine, and considers objections concerning hereditary succession and the uncertain merits of future monarchs. Drawing on examples from Georgian history, including the reigns of David IV and George the Brilliant, as well as the writings of Otar Chkheidze, David Mirotadze and Jansug Ghvinjilia, and sermons delivered by Patriarch Ilia II and Archpriest Archil, the study explores monarchy as a potential source of lawful, stable and nationally rooted authority. It ultimately argues that a parliamentary monarchy could strengthen Georgia’s sovereignty, institutional development and international standing.